Compiling Corpora for Use as Translation Resources
By Michael Wilkinson,
teaches courses in translation from Finnish to English,
oral expression and liaison interpreting
Michael.Wilkinson at uef.fi
Become a member of TranslationDirectory.com at just
$8 per month (paid per year)
previous issues of the Translation Journal
2005) I showed how a corpus analysis tool
can be a useful performance-enhancing aid in translating.
However, before you start using a corpus analysis
tool, you need to have a corpus or corpora for it
to analyse. You have two alternatives: either acquire
ready-made corpora, or make your own ("do-it-yourself")
Ready-made corpora & their limitations
large variety of corpora in English and in other languages
have been compiled in electronic format for various
purposes over the past few decades. The website "Gateway
to Corpus Linguistics on the Internet" at http://www.corpus-linguistics.de/
provides a useful summary of many of the best-known
corpora, including information on when and by whom
they were compiled, as well as their size, contents,
most of the English-language corpora mentioned on
the "Gateway" site, although of great value to linguistic
researchers, are not very useful as translation aids
since they tend to be either too general in nature
or somewhat outdated; in addition, some collections
consist of spoken texts or historical texts, and these
are of little help when translating modern written
language. Moreover, some of these corpora are not
accessible to the general public, and most of those
that are accessible are rather expensive, requiring
that you either pay a subscription fee or purchase
"Gateway" site mentions several multi-million-word
"mega-corpora". Some of these have been used in dictionary
compilation, while others have been used for linguistic
research. One of the best-known mega-corpora of British
English is the British National Corpus (BNC), a 100
million-word collection of samples of written and
spoken language from a wide range of sources, designed
to represent a wide cross-section of current British
English. It was first released in 1995. The written
part (90%) includes, for example, extracts from regional
and national newspapers, specialist periodicals and
journals for all ages and interests, academic books
and popular fiction, published and unpublished letters
and memoranda, school and university essays, among
many other kinds of text. However, the BNC has, despite
its large size, serious limitations as a translation
aid if you are translating contemporary specialized
& Pearson (2002, pages 46-47) provide a good example
of this. If you were translating a text on mechanical
engineering and wanted to investigate the term "nut"
and its various collocations, the 100-million-word
BNC would produce 670 occurrences. However you would
find that most of the concordance lines are not helpful
to you, since most of the contexts show examples of
"nut" being used in other ways, such as the edible
type or an eccentric person. Although some of the
occurrences describe the type of nuts used in engineering,
it takes time to identify them; there is excessive
"noise" due to the fact that "nut" is a homonym--it
has various meanings--and so separating the wheat
from the chaff is a time-consuming process.
& Pearson go on to report that a search for the
term "nut" in a 10,000-word corpus containing catalogues,
product descriptions and assembly instructions from
companies in the manufacturing industry generated
49 occurrences. Although this was far fewer than the
BNC search, the findings were far more relevant, since
the noise was considerably reduced, and it was easy
to spot the many different types of nut used in manufacturing
(e.g. collar nut, compression nut, flare nut, knurled
nut, winged nut), as well as the verbs that collocate
with nut (e.g. thread, screw, tighten, loosen).
WordSmith Tools controller
it is corpora that are specialized, in the sense that
they are restricted to the language of a particular
special field, that are of most use to the translator.
Such specialized corpora that focus on Language for
Special Purposes are sometimes referred to as LSP
very few ready-made LSP corpora are at present available--either
for free or commercially--and so translators should
be able to compile their own specialized corpora,
tailor-made to suit their own requirements. In this
respect, a number of translator-trainers have reported
on the use of student-compiled "ad hoc" corpora (also
referred to as "virtual", "DIY" or "disposable" corpora)
in their courses. For example Varantola (2003) describes
a workshop experiment conducted at the Department
of Translation Studies at the University of Tampere,
Finland, using the Web as a resource for comparable
corpora. However, her students pointed out that finding
relevant corpus material is often difficult and questioned
the cost-efficiency of compiling and using ad hoc
corpora. Similarly, Zanettin (2002) describes an experiment
carried out at the School of Translators of the University
of Bologna in Forli in which students were encouraged
to tackle translation problems by using DIY corpora
compiled from the Web. Although many of the students
found their corpora useful for finding information
on terminology, phraseology, and collocations, they
also noted that searching the web pages, creating
the corpus and analysing it with a concordancer was
time-consuming. And indeed this is a major problem--the
time-investment needed in compiling a corpus is probably
excessive in terms of productivity unless the translator
foresees doing a large number of similar translations
in the future.
corpus analysis tools prefer the texts they handle
to be in plain text format (*.txt), though some can
also process texts in other formats, too. However,
the first step in compiling your corpus is to find
suitable sources on the topic you are interested in,
and then convert them to plain text. There are a number
of ways to do this.
you are a professional translator, it is probable
that you receive many of your assignments in electronic
format. For example, if you are translating from Finnish
to English and vice versa, it is highly likely that
you will gradually accumulate a large number of authentic
source texts in both English and Finnish in Word format.
In this case, it is very easy to create corpora of
your source texts by re-saving them in plain text
format. If you are a student, you could already initiate
this process by encouraging your teachers to provide
all your translation assignments as Word documents.
wife, Arja, is a professional translator, and one
of her special fields is translating tourist brochures
from Finnish into English. I recently compiled a 70,000
word Finnish-language tourism corpus using her source
texts. This was done in only a matter of hours, since
virtually all of her assignments come in electronic
format. This corpus can be used when translating from
Finnish into other languages to find out, for example,
how common a term is in the source language, and to
find contexts which throw some light on its meaning.
It can also be used as an aid for translating tourist
texts from other languages into Finnish, especially
if Finnish is the translator's L2. (For example those
students at Savonlinna School of Translation Studies
whose L1 is Russian and L2 is Finnish can exploit
this corpus when translating tourist brochures from
Russian into Finnish).
can search for printed material, such as books, magazines,
brochures and journals, and convert text from them
by using a scanner (a device linked to optical character
recognition software that allows printed documents
to be converted to electronic text; flat-bed scanners
look somewhat like a copy machine). Numerous guides
on using scanners can be found on the Internet. You
could take a look at the following:
the disadvantage with using this method is that it
is relatively slow in comparison with some other methods.
are a number of newspapers and magazines available
on-line. Some require an annual subscription to access
them, some offer articles for sale, while others provide
free access. A web page with links to English-language
newspapers can be found at:
a web page with links to English-language magazines
can be found at:
next step is to identify articles that interest you,
and then copy and paste them into your Word document
using Paste Special → Unformatted
Text, and then finally save them as Plain Text.
professional and academic journals require an annual
subscription to access them, or offer articles for
sale. However students and staff at academic institutes
often have free on-line access to a wide range of
journals via their institute's network. Many of the
articles in these journals are in PDF format, which
can be downloaded and saved using Acrobat Reader.
You can select text and copy it into your Word document
and finally save it as Plain Text. Using the Office
Clipboard to collect passages of text for pasting
will speed up this process.
educational establishments also allow students and
staff on-line access to a large number of reference
books and encyclopedias, such as the Encyclopedia
Britannica, Grove Dictionary of Art, and Grove Dictionary
of Music and Musicians, where you can search for relevant
articles to include in your corpus.
Web provides a vast source of potential material for
corpus compilation in addition to the online newspapers,
magazines, journals and books mentioned above. The
tricky bit is finding relevant and reliable texts
to include in your corpus from amongst the billions
of web pages. And once you have found suitable texts,
"painting" them and copying them into your Word document
takes time. In general, the more sophisticated and
attractive the websites, the more laborious they are
to capture and convert, since the pages are often
linked together with a complex system of hyperlinks.
As Bowker (2002) states: "...good web design is not
conducive to easy corpus building!"
an English-language Tourism Corpus
description of how I compiled a 670,000 word corpus
of English-language tourist brochure texts can provide
you with some guidelines as to how to compile your
own special field corpora.
texts of the Tourism Corpus were mainly derived from
tourist brochures that appear on the Internet in PDF
format. In many cases, converting these into plain
text format was quite easy, though in most cases careful
post-editing needed to be done, since headings and
titles frequently tended to switch positions. In some
cases paragraphs also tended to switch positions,
and although this is not a problem when viewing a
KWIC display where the size of co-text (the "span")
is limited to only four or five words on either side
of the search pattern, the paragraph order was corrected
to enable users to look at concordance lines in a
wider context. I would recommend doing the post-editing
while the text is still in Word document (*.doc) format,
since it is easier to read when various fonts and
colours are still present, and only after editing
save as Text files (*.txt).
some brochures, especially those using several columns
and complex layouts, were very difficult to convert
into text format due to the graphics employed in their
design. Very often, the more sophisticated and attractive
the brochure, the trickier it was to convert into
text format. Lines from one column became mixed up
with those from another column or section of the page.
In these cases, use was made of FineReader optical
character recognition (OCR) scanning software.
can be used to scan and process printed material,
but in compiling the Tourism Corpus, FineReader was
mainly used for processing PDF files. FineReader first
scanned the PDF file and then "read" it, i.e. it recognised
blocks of text and images. Whereas converting from
Adobe Acrobat into Word format posed problems in the
form of mixed-up columns, with FineReader it was possible
to determine in which order titles and columns were
presented in the plain text version of the brochure.
In addition, proofreading seemed to be easier within
FineReader, because the text was still in its original
layout and the recognised text could be compared with
the brochure view.
comparison with converting from Adobe Acrobat into
Word format, using FineReader was not notably faster.
It could eliminate some of the problems of straight
converting, but at the same time one had to be careful
with occasional extra spaces within words or missing
spaces between two words. However, FineReader's Check
Spelling feature was very useful in detecting these
problems. Finally, the reasons for using FineReader
had much to do with its user-friendliness, which can
be an important factor when cleaning large volumes
of text in a complicated layout.
corpus could just as well have been compiled by concentrating
on the text appearing on the actual web pages of tourism
marketing organisations or tourism service providers,
since the language usage on web pages is probably
the same as that used in brochures, and indeed the
texts used in the brochure(s) are sometimes almost
identical to those appearing on the website.
further problem with tourist brochures--and indeed
text from websites, is that graphics, layout, and
typographical features are almost always important
parts of the text. When converting brochures to plain
text, these non-text-based elements, especially pictures,
which may be essential to understanding the text,
lot depends on the corpus
compiling your corpus you should try to:
that the texts are not translations, and that they
have been written by native speakers who are experts
in the special field in question. Of course non-natives
can often write just as well as native speakers,
if not better, but there is the danger that texts
by non-natives may include non-idiomatic expressions.
a large selection of texts by a variety of authors,
in order to get a wide overview of the type of language
used in the field in question.
full texts rather than text extracts, since if you
choose the latter, you may lose important concepts
or terms that appear only in one section of the
text. For example, in tourist brochures "persuasive"
language is sometimes concentrated at the beginning
of the brochure, while "informational" elements
come later in the brochure.
recent texts, in order to ensure that the linguistic
and conceptual information you retrieve is up-to-date.
it pay off?
method you use, compiling your own corpus is a time-consuming
process. So if you are a student-translator or professional
translator working on a one-off, relatively short
special-field translation, it will probably not be
worthwhile in terms of productivity to compile a corpus
of target-language texts in the field in question
to aid you with the translation brief. However, if
you have a very large brief amounting to dozens or
hundreds of pages, investing time in compiling a comparable
target-language corpus might pay off. Moreover, if
you are working as an in-house translator for a company
engaged in a specific sector, you may be able to cooperate
with other translators and pool texts to create a
joint corpus. And if, as a professional, you are regularly
translating texts belonging to one or several special
fields, gradually building up target-language corpora
in those fields may well, in the long run, enhance
the quality of your work and increase your productivity.
Lynne (2002). "Working Together: A Collaborative
Approach to DIY Corpora". Paper presented at
the First International Workshop on Language Resources
for Translation Work and Research, Gran Canaria,
28 May 2002.
Viewable online at: http://www.ifi.unizh.ch/cl/yuste/postworkshop/repository/lbowker.pdf
Lynne & Pearson, Jennifer (2002). Working with
Specialized Language: a practical guide to using corpora.
Krista (2003). "Translators and Disposable Corpora"
in Zanettin, F., Bernardini S. and Stewart D.(eds.)
Corpora in Translator Education Manchester:
St Jerome, pp 55-70.
Michael (2005). "Using a Specialized Corpus to Improve
Translation Quality", in Translation Journal,
Volume 9, No 3.
Viewable online at: http://accurapid.com/journal/33corpus.htm
Michael (2005a). "Discovering Translation Equivalents
in a Tourism Corpus by Means of Fuzzy Searching",
in Translation Journal, Volume 9, No 4.
Viewable online at: http://accurapid.com/journal/34corpus.htm
Frederico (2002). "DIY Corpora: The WWW and the
Translator" In Maia, Belinda / Haller, Jonathan
/ Urlrych, Margherita (eds.) Training the Language
Services Provider for the New Millennium, Porto:
Faculdade de Letras, Universidade do Porto, pp 239-248.
Submit your article!
Read more articles - free!
Read sense of life articles!
this article to your colleague!
more translation jobs? Click here!
agencies are welcome to register here - Free!
translators are welcome to register here - Free!