Enterprise-wide Content Convergence
Interview with John Olsen
VP Business Development, Stibo Catalog
john.erik.olsen@stibo.com
Get the List of 4,500+ Translation Agencies Now! No Recurring Membership Fees!
Founded centuries
ago in Denmark and owned by a private trust, Stibo
Catalog is today a flourishing provider of Enterprise
Content Management systems (ECMS), with a special
focus on Catalog Management solutions for the B2B
segment. According to John Olsen, VP for Business
Development at Stibo, “The company is positioned
at the point where digital assets, records and Web
content are converging, ready to deliver full solutions
to this new content nexus. At the end of the day,
ECMS is all about ensuring efficient internal workflows
and infrastructure to meet customers’ future
requirements.” Read how an old Europe technology
supplier sees the new realities of the global content
business.
What makes Stibo’s
STEP Enterprise Content Management System (ECMS) different
from its rivals?
Many companies position
themselves as Enterprise Content Management vendors
today. But in the eyes of the analysts, the Enterprise
Content Management market consists of vendors that
at least have capabilities for Web Content Management,
Document Management and Digital Asset Management.
Documentum is considered the leader in this space.
At Stibo, we see ourselves
as an Enterprise Content Management vendor as well,
but we offer solutions for three specific sub-areas:
- Catalog Content Management
- Product Information Management
- Cross-Media Publishing
We also have document
management capabilities that can be tailored to the
needs of our customers, e.g., in the newspaper publishing
market. And the same goes for digital asset management.
We have a background in print and started our catalog
management business in 1976 before the rise of all-digital
media. The handling of images has always been a very
important dimension for our customers.
How
is the “data explosion” affecting your
customers?
We expect the explosion
in content needs to continue as the use of Intranets
expands and as e-catalogs play an increasing role
in the e-procurement process and in electronic market
places. The amount and complexity of information within
organizations is growing dramatically. Current predictions
estimate that the volume of content will grow by a
factor of 5 over the current level in the next five
years due to the growing popularity of Intranets alone.
The challenge is to handle this content in a consistent,
cost-effective and integrated manner so that it becomes
a business asset rather than simply a cost.
And this is where Catalog
Content Management comes in. In the recent past, a
company may have had five catalogs a year to produce
(for example, a Web catalog, three printed seasonal-specific
catalogs and a CD-ROM catalog). But today, that same
company may have hundreds of catalogs to manage. The
line-up might look something like this:
- Three printed catalogs, but available
in ten different languages
- Fifty e-catalogs to support with
a different selection of product data on e-markets
- One hundred customers’ e-catalogs,
which again offer a different selection of product
data, all in different languages
With our Catalog Content
Management solutions, the goal is to manage this complexity
so that ROI is achieved fairly quickly. To be able
to achieve ROI on its content, a company needs to
be able to repurpose and reformat content over and
over again from a single repository. It needs to organize
and enrich its product data so that it can react quickly
to new publishing demands and then syndicate selected
types and pieces of content in whatever format and
in whatever language is required by the business focus
at a given time. We believe that what is called Product
Information Management is the solution to such massive
publishing needs for companies with huge inventories,
such as large-scale manufacturers in automotive and
other component-intensive industries.
If a company organizes
its product data properly in a database with strong
Product Information Management capabilities, it can
then make selected content available for the right
destination through its Catalog Content Management
capabilities. The company will then require powerful
tools to push this selected content through whatever
channel is needed to reach its customer base or partners
- this could be an electronic, CD-ROM or printed catalog.
We have designed our STEP Content Management Suite
to provide powerful tools in all these areas.
What
do you consider to be must-have features for an ECMS
today?
These are the capabilities
we consider to be critical today:
- The ability to handle languages,
using a variety of translation tools, such as translation
memory and translation workflow tools.
- Advanced templating technology
that benefits customers through dynamic updating
of Web sites and Intranets, and the complete automation
of building pages and indexes for printed catalogs.
For example, when a company increases its production
rate from 30-50 to 1,000-2,000 pages per day for
a 2,000-page printed catalog in fifteen different
languages, it will realize tremendous savings and,
equally important, reduce its time-to-market substantially.
- Being able to easily create
the same look-and-feel between CD-ROM and Web catalogs
to ensure the same customer experience across all
platforms. This means combining both types of catalogs
so that the customers do not know in which application
they are searching for information. This is necessary
because many customers still consider CD-ROM to
be an excellent publishing option.
- The ability to nurture online
relationships with suppliers. With 1,000 suppliers
or more, a company needs tools to import data in
all kinds of different formats, plus the possibility
to enrich this data to provide the experience that
its customers expect. This process also requires
efficient approval workflows.
The biggest overall
advance we can provide to our B2B customers is the
combination of all these capabilities. We focus strongly
on providing advanced data management tools and combining
these with advanced publishing tools. Other players
in this space tend to focus on just one part of the
picture and then work in ‘best of breed’
partnerships with suppliers of another part of the
total solution. The leading software houses are also
starting to provide overall enterprise content management
solutions, so it is important for us to be positioned
at the point where digital assets, records and Web
content are converging, ready to deliver full solutions
to this new content nexus.
Now
that solutions are available for single sourcing,
centralized content management, locale and language
tagging, and adequate interfacing with localization
processes, do you consider that the localization aspect
is now in theory ‘solved?’
We have never viewed
localization/globalization as a major problem. This
is probably due to the fact that Stibo Catalog has
been present in mainland Europe, the U.K. and the
U.S. for more than two decades, and for five years
now in Asia (Singapore). Our customers are nearly
all international customers, and addressing language
and localization has been a “must” for
us to deliver effective solutions. We believe that
once a company follows the single content repository
philosophy, localization solutions fall into place.
All of our new customers
have requirements for both global and local deployment.
They often start locally to ensure that the content
and publishing infrastructure is put in place before
going global. The importance of building a single
global repository is to avoid spreading source content
across several databases all over the world. Most
important is that a single repository offer strong
support to a company’s branding.
We have companies come
to us with several product IDs for a single product,
different names for the same attribute, and a lack
of knowledge about what images are available for specific
products. If a company builds and uses a single repository,
then management gains control. When a global organization
knows where to go to find its content, then its management
can be sure that all content has been through the
approval workflow and is therefore ready for syndication
and publishing.
A further dimension to
the single repository requirement is that if a company
consolidates its databases, it can create a more efficient
environment. In recent years, CEOs and CIOs have been
focusing on creating more efficient workflows and
infrastructures since IT budgets have been more or
less flat. By managing all of this content more efficiently
through a single repository, a company can benefit
more from all those investments that were made in
CRM in the dot.com days when budgets were more generous.
The general idea is that Content Management systems
can help tie the whole content infrastructure together
online – we call this supporting the entire
Information Supply Chain. Properly handled, with interfaces
to localization tools such as translation memories
and to localization workflows, the localization process
forms a natural part of this supply chain and will
thus deliver a return on the upstream investment.
What
are typical blind spots in corporate understanding
of the implementation issues for ECMS?
In my opinion, many
companies still lack a genuine Content Strategy. They
haven’t turned content into an asset, which
I believe for many B2B companies will prove to be
a critical issue within a fairly short period.
Unless they can transform
their content into an asset (probably in the future
one of the most important assets within a company,
if not the most important), companies cannot react
to new needs from their customer base or from the
market in general. One of our customers now has one
request per week to enter a new e-market. If a company
cannot react immediately to this, it may loose out
to the competition and suffer from a serious long-term
impact on its business.
From an implementation
point of view, organizing and enriching product data
so that it becomes an asset is a fairly difficult
task and must be appreciated as such. Many companies
have not started this migration process yet, so this
too may have a negative impact on their long-term
survival. A PricewaterhouseCoopers survey a couple
of years back confirmed this, and suggested that content
strategy be placed on boardroom agenda, along with
the usual financial issues.
A company cannot play
its part in an online relationship with its key customers
if it cannot deliver the product data they want in
the format and with the attributes they require. And
even if it can do this, it must constantly ensure
that this product data has no errors, since its business
as a supplier may suffer if it does.
Where
is new functionality emerging that must be addressed
by ECMS developers?
As companies and activity
in general become more content-centric, I see the
growing importance of such developments as collaboration
tools that offer a single interface to various underlying
technologies. Such fast-growing areas as e-procurement
and e-commerce will therefore have an effect on the
very architecture of content management solutions.
At the end of the day, ECMS is all about ensuring
efficient internal workflows and infrastructure so
that a company can meet its customers’ future
requirements, and a large part of this is to provide
the same customer experience with the right timing
across all media.
Although
no one dares to make predictions ten years ahead anymore,
how do you see the Enterprise Content Management System
market developing over the next decade?
There is no doubt that
many CMS vendors are now heading the same way and
trying to provide the same capabilities. Many companies
in this ECMS space have been able to implement functionality
by making acquisitions, as we have seen in the case
of Documentum. However, I would not like to be just
a Web Content Management or Document Management system
vendor, because I believe they will soon be facing
tough times as content converges.
Vendors that have only
Product Information Management capabilities will tend
to add more publishing functionalities, but it is
not easy to enter real cross-media publishing. It
requires deep understanding and knowledge about such
areas as publishing cycles and workflows. If you ask
vendors about where they are going, you might find
that the situation some years down the road looks
more or less the same as today’s from the point
of view of capabilities. But they will no doubt find
other more market- and customer-driven ways to differentiate
their offerings. At the end of the day, we are all
trying to meet the total requirements of an enterprise.
At Stibo, we think that if you are a B2B company with
high volume syndication and publishing needs that
require powerful channel management, then ECM suites
will win out over best-of-breed concepts.
John
Olsen is Vice President of Business
Development at Stibo Catalog. He can be reached at
john.erik.olsen@stibo.com.
Stibo is among the sponsors of the Global Content
Management Seminar to be held on June 30th during
the 2003
LISA FORUM EUROPE in London.
Reprinted
by permission from the Globalization Insider,
4 June 2003, Volume XII, Issue 2.5.
Copyright
the Localization Industry Standards Association
(Globalization Insider: www.localization.org,
LISA: www.lisa.org)
and S.M.P. Marketing Sarl (SMP) 2004
Read
more articles - Free!
E-mail
this article to your colleague!
Need
more translation jobs? Click here!
Translation
agencies are welcome to register here - Free!
Freelance
translators are welcome to register here - Free!
Subscribe
to TranslationDirectory.com newsletter - Free!
Take
part in TranslationDirectory.com poll - your voice
counts!
|